|
Not the Indispensable Party
Dear Editor:
With respect to the subject four parcels: 39.-2-12.1 through 39.-2-12.4. Mr. Terio is not the title owner nor a party in interest.
The general Public in the past has not comment on this four parcels issues because they believe it could not happen to them. Well believe me it could because it is happening to me.
In 1998 through 2003 in respect to said four parcels the commissioner had subject Mr. Terio over $26,000 in which had paid under protect, to object at a later date. And the unpaid taxes for 2004 through 2006 of over $20,000 for said four parcels. On May 18, 2007, the commissioner title search of said four parcels does not belong to Mr. Terio, because such search of said parcels does not conform to any recorded deeds of parcels 39.-2-12.1 through 39.-2-12.4. And on November 26, 2007 the attorney on behalf of the commissioner Carlin the said four parcels all been withdrawn from the County's foreclosure action, in which commissioner Carlin refuses to dismiss Mr. Terio from the foreclosure pending action.
Although the Supreme Court Putnam County still has jurisdiction over the foreclosure of said four parcels. This Court does not have subject matter jurisdiction or personal jurisdiction over Mr. Terio because he is not the "indispensable party" or a party in interest.
A judge who is without subject matter jurisdiction must dismiss the action. And if not he is committing "treason."
Vincent Terio
Fishkill
| 
